I'm for fixing JELLY-177 and JELLY-196 (haven't really looked at 196, just the description). 191 is for a TagLib, so it would be released separately anyway.
The code for JELLY-177 looks good when copied verbatim. I did a couple of Servlet tests but nothing that could be automated without Cactus. Will commit this tonight or tomorrow after a little more testing. Hans -----Original Message----- From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:45 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [jelly] RC2? We should maybe make a round of the bugs submitted, or ? Hans mentioned he wanted to give a stab at JELLY-177, looks good. Looks like JELLY-191 and JELLY-196 could be considered... Any opinion ? paul Le 20 janv. 05, à 06:43, Dion Gillard a écrit : > Yep, I'm up for RC2 after some testing and then assuming no > showstoppers, a 1.0 straight after. > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:32:32 -0500, Hans Gilde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> I couldn't fix the problems with my weak ref implementation, so I >> tweaked >> Paul's fix a little to make it thread safe and better for inheritance. >> >> Anyway, the memory leak is gone and all unit tests pass after many >> iterations. >> >> Are we ready for an RC2 and, hopefully, a quick release of version 1? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
