On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 14:12 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 08:54 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote: > > --- Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 21:26 +0100, robert burrell > > > donkin wrote: > > > > here are my results obtained by comparing the > > > theory with the current > > > > behaviour. > > > > > > > > (1) JCL Behaves As Expected (50%) > > > > --------------------------------- > > > > 1,2,3,4,7,8,11,12,15,16,17,18,19,23,27,31 > > > > > > > > (2) JCL Throws Exception Rather Than Logging To > > > Log4J (28%) > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > 5,6,13,14,21,22,24,25,29 > > > > > > > > (3) JCL Throws Exception Rather Than Logging To > > > java.util.logging (22%) > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > 9,10,20,26,28,30,32 > > > > > > Where are these scenarios (1-32) documented? > > > > > > > They're in the demonstration folder in svn. May be > > another way to get to it, but this works: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/demonstration/src/java/overview.html?rev=159142&view=log > > Thanks, found them.
i now have unit tests that replicate the failure cases. i'm wondering whether to commit them onto a branch so that everyone can take a look, check their accuracy and take a look at fixes. opinions? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
