Glad you found it. On 5/26/05, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi: > > I found possible solution. With 1.3.1, if I set *fork* to *false*, the > test is found and run. Weird. > > Gary > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2005 5:06 PM > *To:* Gary Gregory > *Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List > *Subject:* Re: FW: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under > 1.4.2 > > That is so very odd. I'm at a loss to explain it. I don't have access to > a system with JDK 1.3 so I'm not able to try it. Maybe someone else can > try? > > One thing I did find I needed to do was to change th junit version in > default.properties from 3.7 to 3.8.1. Gary, could you try making this > change and building under 1.3.1? I'm just curious to see if this makes a > difference, though I don't see why it should. > > Thanks. > > On 5/25/05, *Gary Gregory* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Steven: > > I updated from CVS today and got new build.xml. I still get the error > below on Sun Java 1.3.1_14. > > Thanks, > > Gary > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Gary Gregory > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 24, 2005 7:12 PM > *To:* 'Steven Caswell' > *Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List > *Subject:* RE: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under 1.4.2 > > Steven: > > (You're welcome.) > > Downloaded RC6a-src and I am now experiencing Weirdness: I run "ant clean > dist-build-2.1 test" which works fine on Sun Java 1.4.2_08. > > On Sun Java 1.3.1_14 I get: > > test.lang: > > [echo] Running lang package tests ... > > [java] Class not found "org.apache.commons.lang.LangTestSuite" > > BUILD FAILED > > C:\temp\commons-lang-2.1-RC6\build.xml:166: Java returned: 1 > > Which makes no sense at first glance. > > Gary > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 24, 2005 7:00 PM > *To:* Gary Gregory > *Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List > *Subject:* Re: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under 1.4.2 > > Gary, > > I put up the revised source distribution in > http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1 > <http://www.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1> > > I named them commons-lang-2.1-RC6a-src.* so you could easily tell they are > modified. I was just too lazy to change it to RC7 for a minor non-code fix, > and since there will probably be an RC7 with the date utils test change. > > Thanks for your patience and thanks for testing these things. > > On 5/24/05, *Steven Caswell* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Gary, > > I have a fix for that problem. I'll go ahead and put up a corrected source > distribution with the fix and without the DateUtilsTest correction so you > can try 1.3.1. > > On 5/24/05, *Gary Gregory* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > I'd like to check 1.3.1 but... running "ant clean build-dist-2.1 test" > from src-zip does not make it past text tests: > > test.text: > [echo] Running text package tests ... > [java] Class not found " org.apache.commons.lang.text.TextTestSuite" > > BUILD FAILED > C:\temp\commons-lang-2.1-RC6\build.xml:206: Java returned: 1 > > Which should not be run in the 1st place... > > (Ant 1.6.4 and Java 1.4.2_08) > > Gary > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:39 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under 1.4.2 > > All, > > I have discovered a group of tests in the DateUtils test case that fails > > under 1.2.2 but not under 1.4.2. They are testing the DateUtils round > method > when rounding a date in the MET timezone across the start and end of > DST. If > I remember correctly, this was in response to a user bug report. In > particular the test is at line 472 of the testRound method in > DataUtilsTest.java. > > The test passes fine when run under 1.4.2 but fails under 1.2.2. I don't > > have a 1.3 installation available so I don't know if it passes or fails > under 1.3. > > I propose that we put a condition around the test so that is only run > when > the Java version is 1.4, and add a note to the round method javadoc and > the > release notes stating that the round method may not work properly in all > > cases involving DST rollovers in previous JVMs, with this case as an > example. > > Thoughs? > > -- > Steven Caswell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org > > > > > -- > Steven Caswell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org > > > > > -- > Steven Caswell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org > > > > > -- > Steven Caswell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org >
-- Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
