On 6/23/05, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 13:50 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > - protected Hashtable headers = new Hashtable(); > > + protected Map headers = new Hashtable(); > > Is there a specific reason to still use Hashtable here? If not, I think > HashMap might be nicer.
No reason. The original patch simply replaced the declaration. > Hashtable is synchronized, but I don't see that being relevant here > (except that the Hashtable imposes a performance hit - hardly > significant though in this situation). Yep, though it would be nicer to just use HashMap. > And Hashtable will not allow null keys, but I don't see that being > relevant either. > > Regards, > > Simon -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ "You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live." - George Bernard Shaw --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
