On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 22:58 +0100, sebb wrote: > On 17/07/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simon Kitching wrote: > > > I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether > > > there should *be* a 1.0.1 release while others have backed it. This vote > > > is an opportunity to see which approach people want to go with. > > > > Regrettably, I must -1 this unless I see an email authorising us to > > release this with an Apache 1.1 license (ie. I believe we need special > > board etc. dispensation). With an email of dispensation, my vote changes > > to -0. > > Would it be enough just to change LICENSE.txt in the root directory to > the 2.0 license? > Or do all the source files have to be changed as well?
All the source files would need to be changed. Each source file has text that states that it is licensed under APL1.1, so tossing a 2.0 license file into the distribution doesn't cause those to be "relicensed". IANAL and all that. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
