DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35858>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35858 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-27 08:08 ------- I will have to dig a little deeper into this. First I'd like to know exactly how a call to subset() changes the original configuration. Generally I agree with your patch, but we will have to check whether it causes problems if one Node object is added as child to two different parent nodes (the nodes contain a reference to their parent). Another approach would be to remove this special implementation of subset() in HierarchicalConfiguration and rely on the implementation in AbstractConfiguration. Will have to check if the tests then pass. IIRC HierarchicalConfiguration.subset() had been once removed before the 1.0 release and was later re-introduced because of problems with the ConfigurationXMLDocument class, which later became obsolet. I somehow thought that subset() after that was removed again, so I am now a bit surprised that it exists in HierarchicalConfiguration at all. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
