Noel J. Bergman wrote: >I re-read the commit messages, and no it was not entirely clear, at least >not in terms of the clarity I'd want for IP clearance. The concern is >tracking provenance. > > Ok, do I need to edit the commit message?
>Ant is in Subversion. If these are patched versions of Ant code, why didn't >you use `svn cp` to initially populate the tree, with appropriate comments, >then apply the patches? > > Only some new components are in there, but according to their dev list they have voted on moving the main repository (that includes this code) in the next couple of weeks. Is this necessary if Niklas has a CLA on file? > >Grey areas, but the larger the contributions that more important that we get >a CLA. And, as you noted, the o.a.c.e.launcher package was created by him, >and is not just a set of patches. > > Actually, I thought originally this was an original contribution, but on closer inspection I've found that it is also derived from another set of Ant classes. So, the question now is what is necessary to clear this up? Is a CLA from Niklas (and CCLA if necessary) plus modification of the original commit message to indicate origin sufficient? On reading the IP clearance document, it appears so. - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
