Hi Tom:

I'm in the middle of work and integrating a rework from Oliver on free
time, so I cannot look at this at the moment. I'll try to peek tonight.

Cheers,
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Schindl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 8:52 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] Questions concerning VariableFormatter
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Gary Gregory schrieb:
> > Hello:
> [...]
> 
> > Simon's full message is here:
> >
http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg63493.html
> >
> > Gary
> >
> 
> Ok. Thanks for clearing up this so what's with the proposed formating
of
> substiution values. Is the way I tried it now acceptable? If not could
> anybody tell me how a patch to VariableFormatter should look like to
be
> acceptable?
> 
> Tom
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFC+NEakVPeOFLgZFIRAmanAKCcs/7eGl/B0FzB40i+Cl0Q3yVFAwCgmSiG
> Y8kiQUjvKWEyUwpfYnfdKSE=
> =j3kd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to