Well, I don't really like the idea of calling it (or joining another project named) commons-reflect, as that's not really what this package will be about. The package will really just be about building proxies to other objects and those proxies do not necessarily use reflection. I like commons-proxy, but I would have to agree that the name could be somewhat misleading, as Brett pointed out.
-----Original Message----- From: Joerg Hohwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 6:46 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: Sandbox Project Proposal: Commons-Proxy... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Brett, Brett Porter wrote: > Does it have to be called commons-proxy? I thought it was something to > do with http when I read the subject :) That is propably true. I suppose this one is up to James. Anyways some brainstorming: commons-objectproxy (might be a little long) commons-facade (mhm maybe? but might lead to other ideas) commons-reflection (would not fit the CGLIB support, but might make it open for further development of new ideas of that category). James the scene is yours :) > > - Brett > Regards Jörg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC+TIZmPuec2Dcv/8RAtAtAJ99a2tl+6FAaC8iUV/Q+itqrTHOoACfdU+s 4JBdyCpwOzQNg/SrX16Ru+M= =rAn0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]