DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37086>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37086 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 14:41 ------- The minimum requirement is that the javadoc fully specify implemented behavior, which in the case of 1.0 implementations of complex arithmetic and equals, it does not. We discussed earlier using C99x Annex G as a guide (similarly to what some other Java Complex implementations do and similarly to how we have tried to follow 454 for double arithmetic), for the conisistency reasons mentioned above. Lack of public availability of the spec is an inconvenience; but that does not prevent us making our impls consistent with it. The key is to fully document in our javadoc what the behavior that we are implementing is. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
