DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37107>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37107 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 03:07 ------- Can the pom in the repository be fixed as well? http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/commons-chain/commons-chain/1.0/commons-chain-1.0.pom At least the servlet and portlet sections could be fixed. I'm not so sure about changing the MyFaces dependency, since it involves a different version. Then again, it could be argued that switching from a beta to the official certified api .jar isn't a bad thing. :) For now, projects which depend on Chain 1.0, can work around the unwanted m2 transitive dependencies with exclusions. For example: <dependency> <groupId>myfaces</groupId> <artifactId>myfaces-api</artifactId> <version>1.1.0</version> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupId>myfaces</groupId> <artifactId>myfaces-jsf-api</artifactId> </exclusion> </exclusions> </dependency> and <dependency> <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId> <artifactId>servlet-api</artifactId> <version>2.4</version> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupId>servletapi</groupId> <artifactId>servletapi</artifactId> </exclusion> </exclusions> </dependency> -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
