DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37379>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37379 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-11 23:23 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Additionally, your standard implementation for > > > > getTransactionBaseDir > > > > is not acceptable as a described before. This should either be configurable > > or > > have a more reasonable implementation as also described before. > > Another possibility would be to use generatedUniqueTxId() as base for the > directory name and to store the mapping of transaction IDs to directory names > in > a map. For transaction Ids already generated with the above method the key > would > be the same as the value, for external IDs like my Xids this would map the Xid > to the directory name. As the generatedUniqueTxId() is assumed to work at the > moment, this should work too. WDYT? Sounds like a reasonable approach. However, for the default implementation I would like to stick to the schema that is used now. When you make getTransactionBaseDir overridable you can easily implement whatever mapping you like. This means, taks over your idea minus the implementation in getTransactionBaseDir which will continue to return the direct string. Agreed? Oliver -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
