DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32785>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32785 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #17059|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-28 05:07 ------- Created an attachment (id=17060) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17060&action=view) 3rd Patch for DiskFileItem I guess the 2nd patch isn't a great idea either since its not v.efficient copying a ton of data. Attaching a 3rd patch - if its not "in memory" this one caches the File that DeferredFileOutputStream has written to when serializing. Everywhere that referenced the DeferredFileOutputStream now checks to see if that File is there first. If it is "in memory" it re-creates the DeferredFileOutputStream. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
