On 12/3/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Hate to be an "old fart" here but was ant really all that bad? > > > > Well it is a question isn't it? I suppose this is a flame thread, but I > > have to ask, have we over the last two years or so actually got the > > benefits that maven promised? And do we believe that maven2 will help?
Oh, forgot this bit. If we do move back to Ant; I think we absolutely have to be looking into the new features that let us standardise things. Moving back to a time when each component had its own large build.xml that had to be grokked to work on it is a definite step backwards. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
