Please allow me to suggest taking these questions to legal-discuss@ Though there may be many subscribed to this list who are quite well informed about licensing, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is probably not a good forum for these discussions.
Marked OT. -Rahul On 12/6/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yesterday I asked the question of compatibility betweeen the LGPL and ASL > licenses, and today I'd like the ask the same, inserting the MPL for LGPL. > > IA-(of course)-NAL, but my reading of the MPL would seem to be compatible > with the ASL, and even as far as integrating the MPL code directly goes. > The usual attribution considerations and notices apply, but that's the > case with the ASL anyway, so not a problem. Otherwise, I personally don't > see anything that would seem to conflict. Can anyone confirm or deny this > conclusion? > > Thanks! > > -- > Frank W. Zammetti > Founder and Chief Software Architect > Omnytex Technologies > http://www.omnytex.com > AIM: fzammetti > Yahoo: fzammetti > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
