Dakota Jack wrote on Thursday, December 15, 2005 7:01 AM:

> You are assuming that there will be a time difference in millis
> between the two time calls. System.currentTimeMillis() takes a
> relatively long time to return.  So, I would not trust that
> assumption. 

No, I just assume that the millis are the same or greater. This implies that 
the clock does not walk backwards (or you hit the millis overflow when running 
the test).

- Jörg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to