On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:25 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 21:02 +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > my proposal was to address rebundlers by adding a separate minimal build > > into the ant file (no dependencies) and then documenting some > > guidelines. if this is done then IMO there's no reason not to ship > > cleaner. > > You mean create a commons-logging-minimal-1.1.jar, containing just the > core stuff (LogFactory, LogFactoryImpl, Log, etc) + SimpleLog and > NoOpLog? I guess we can do that.
+1 plus some recommendations about understanding the dependencies when rebundling. i'll try to pull together a draft document ASAP. > > > NB: I'm hoping to knock JCL1.1 into releasable state over the coming > > > weekend and hold a vote on creating the first RC. Robert/Brian are you > > > out there?? > > > > out there but less active than i'd like to be on commons stuff. lots of > > apache stuff blew up at the foundation level recently :-/ > > > > but if you've got some time over the next week or two, i'll make some > > JCL time. one job that i'd really like to do before shipping 1.1 is to > > finish a comprehensive troubleshooting guide. > > I'm between contracts at the moment and my girlfriend is away overseas. > So I've got more time available than I've had in a while :-). This only > lasts another 6 days though. > > I think we're very close to an RC state, so would like to spend some of > that available time pushing on to that state. If you can make some time > for this it would be great. cool > > BTW dennis should have an apache account by now > > Sorry, which Dennis? Lundberg > Perhaps you mean Brian? IIRC the last time i heard from brian he was busy in china... shame it took *so* long to get the account created :-/ - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
