--- "Daniel F. Savarese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > any rate, I don't have a strong opinion and if most > folks think it makes > more sense for FTPClient to take care of the detail, > then let's do that. > What do others think? The trend seems to have been > to want commons-net > (at least the ftp package) to handle more stuff > automatically and hide > the details.
As an interested observer, I tend to agree that if there is no conceivable use for binary list results, [net] may as well adapt automagically. $0.02 -Matt > > daniel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
