On 3/6/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> >>> I'd rather vfs depend on slide then to copy the classes over.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Yes, this is as it is now, but if slide didnt manage to release we will
> >> never see a vfs release :-(
> >>
> > Is there something that stops a VFS 1.0 with the rest of
> > the providers (without these three)? Sure, it makes the 1.0 less than
> > what we'd like it to be, but still probably better than waiting for
> > slide (or some other foo release).
> >
> I can leave slide out, no problem, but compress is hard as the we loose
> bzip2 and tar support.
>
<snip/>
I understand. If we must have those, then VFS needs to adopt the five
classes it needs:
CBZip2{Input,Output}Stream, BZip2Constants, Tar{Entry,InputStream}
Leave them package scoped, switch to compress when its released? I
realize you'd rather not maintain those classes, but seems like this
is the option that holds the most promise ATM.
-Rahul
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
