On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 14:40 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 3/12/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Demote [latka] to dormant status
> 
> +1
> 
> > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status
> 
> +1
> 
> Are we relegating these to the sandbox, or are we expanding the
> dormant concept to contain released projects?

Hmm..what happened to the proposals recently to change the terminology?

One proposal was to have "active", "maintained" and "unmaintained" which
I liked. Marking these projects "unmaintained" (so users know what they
are getting into) is really what is happening, yes?



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to