On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 14:40 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote: > On 3/12/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Demote [latka] to dormant status > > +1 > > > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > > +1 > > Are we relegating these to the sandbox, or are we expanding the > dormant concept to contain released projects?
Hmm..what happened to the proposals recently to change the terminology? One proposal was to have "active", "maintained" and "unmaintained" which I liked. Marking these projects "unmaintained" (so users know what they are getting into) is really what is happening, yes? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]