On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 12:42 -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote: > -0 because for me, and mentioned by some others, the name "scxml" is > so opaque. When I look at the name I have no clue what it is. I know > it's verbose but simply expanding the "SC" to StateChartXML would > change my mind to full support. (The "StateChartXML" name would be the > same length as "Configuration".)
+1 i also prefer statechartXML or even commons-statechart i think that this will also help to attract users: it's not obvious what scxml means. given that jakarta is very well indexed by google, users looking for an scxml implementation will find commons-statechart. users browsing or looking for a general state management tool may not. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
