Ah. Sounds like something we should be fixing if that's the case.
On 6/21/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe... I'll work on this tonight local time (in about 14 hours). The problem is that "maven dist" calls the maven dist of jelly which is quite wrong, I think... and I did not want to touch this yet. If it sounds appropriate and someone can check my candidate sources I could try this tonight before tagging.... it would only affect, probably, the maven.xml in jelly/jelly-tags. paul Dion Gillard wrote: > Paul can we post the source/binary distribution release after getting > the jar out? > > On 6/20/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> > Regardless of what Jelly has been doing in the past, IMO its a good >> > idea to have source distributions for any release, given which one >> > would be able to (atleast after meeting certain pre-requisites) >> > effectively reproduce the release binaries. Why don't Jelly taglibs >> > have accompanying source distros? >> As a general wish, I only agree. >> In this case both limit in time and the fact that this tag-library is >> exactly made of one class tend me to not do so. >> > Note we had a similar situation in Jakarta Taglibs which AFAICT has >> > since been remedied. Also, a gentle reminder to please tag SVN (as >> > previous Jelly releases have done). >> Of course tagging was planned. Do you mean I should tag RC1 as well ? >> > Since I've not participated in the discussion so far, and wasn't >> > around to bring this up earlier for the last three days when the plan >> > (below) was posted, I will vote 0. I will also encourage you to leave >> > votes open for atleast 72 hours (instead of 36). >> The fact that I sent this wish already long ago, with less clarity >> indeed, pushes me here. And also, the fact that maven plugin release is >> waiting. >> >> paul >> >> > Thank you for your time towards this release. >> > -Rahul >> > >> > >> >> thank you in advance. >> >> >> >> paul >> >> >> >> Paul Libbrecht wrote: >> >> > Here's the plan: >> >> > - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared >> >> > - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no >> risk >> >> > of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed). >> >> > - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce >> >> > jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the >> repo >> >> > at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made. >> >> > - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and >> >> > project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit >> a jar >> >> > upload to iblio's repo. >> >> > >> >> > I have assembled the following release candidates... >> >> > - a site with RC1 version tag: >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/ >> >> > - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject: >> >> > >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >
-- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
