I thought I remembered being part of a conversation about having implementation jars and an API jar. But, I have kind of fell out of the loop a bit w.r.t. JCL. Did that ever come to fruition?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Torsten Curdt Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 12:10 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [logging] Tapestry and JCL > "A pretty common complaint is that commons-logging is a problem. It does > some wierd and awkward class loading things that ultimately result in memory > leaks. Well, it's probably not me to answer (Simon?) but AFAIU most of these things were addressed with the last release of JCL. What's left is basically a bad reputation to live with. A more separated/clean approach is planned for a 2.0 release. But I think so far this has only been discussed. cheers -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
