From: Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 7/31/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - commons-compress : Commons Compression Package > > - commons-vfs : Jakarta commons > > - excalibur-fortress-bean : Repository of reusable components. > > - excalibur-fortress-container-impl : Repository of reusable > > components. > > - excalibur-fortress-container-test : Repository of reusable > > components. > > - excalibur-fortress-examples : Repository of reusable components. > > - excalibur-fortress-migration : Repository of reusable components. > > - excalibur-fortress-platform : Repository of reusable components. > > - excalibur-fortress-testcase : Repository of reusable components. > > - excalibur-monitor : Repository of reusable components. > > - excalibur-sourceresolve : Repository of reusable components. > > - excalibur-xmlutil : Repository of reusable components. > > Bummer! ...I wasn't aware excalibur was already relying on that code! Now > what? > > <snip/> > > A quick look at the gump metadata seems to suggest that its a > cascading effect of breaking [vfs]. > > compress -> vfs -> excalibur-sourceresolve -> rest of the bunch
As this is a sandbox project, we shouldn't be constrained in making changes. Gump is there to inform us of who might complain, but in the end they made the choice to depend on unreleased projects. Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
