It looks to me as though the passivateObject impl in [dbcp]'s
PoolableConnectionFactory takes care of this.  A test case to confirm
would be great.

Phil

On 8/1/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Came across this issue over at Spring:

http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-2090

Is it something DBCP has hit and fixed; or hasn't hit yet?

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to