It looks to me as though the passivateObject impl in [dbcp]'s PoolableConnectionFactory takes care of this. A test case to confirm would be great.
Phil On 8/1/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Came across this issue over at Spring: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-2090 Is it something DBCP has hit and fixed; or hasn't hit yet? Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]