> Well, the number is dependent on the strategy we are trying to achieve: > > a) using '4' would indicate that every major version will have a new package > name, but then you can't use a major version to just remove deprections (a > compatible major version change) > > b) using '5' would indicate the technology reason for the version. The > package would be commons-collections5-1.0. > > c) using '5' as the commons name - commons5-collections-1.0 > d) using '2' would just indicate a "major major" next generation release. The package would be commons-collections2-1.0.
I'd prefer (d) as then we can have a commons-collections3 in the future if needed without having it to couple to a JDK version, in case the fork is not coupled to a new technology brought by the JVM. Ciao, Mario --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
