On 10/29/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/>
This proposal is about making upgrades *predicatable* at the expense of a small amount of pain. I know that most of us don't really like it, but I contend that there is no alternative other than to inflict pain on users of commons over the next few years, and perhaps risk commons becoming irrelevant by being unusable. I also strongly believe we need a cross-commons approach on this.
<snap/> Predictable, cross-commons, whats not to like. I don't know if we risk being unusable, but we may risk being obsolete first if we keep dragging our baggage. When sweeping changes are expected out of components, its a good time to go all out. -Rahul
Stephen
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
