On 11/25/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 09:48 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 11/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 19:53 +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > > thanks to everyone who commented on RC1
> > > >
> > > > i've now cut an RC2 based on the feedback and uploaded the artifacts
> > > > (only) to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/. please
> > > > check them.
> > > >
> > > > unless issues emerge, i'll finish off the process (javadocs, signatures
> > > > and so on) and move to a VOTE.
> > >
> > > no further reports so i'll move towards a vote soon
> >
> > Sorry Robert, kept meaning to look at the rc, but not finding time -
> > couple of comments:
> >
> > 1) The "xdocs" are missing from the source distro
applied
> > 2) Adding "scope" elements to the xerces, xml-apis and junit
> > dependencies in the project.xml will probably help maven 2 downstream
> > users by not pulling in those dependencies
>
> Really important catch.
applied
is there anyway to get the maven folks to take a look at the project.xml
before it's released rather than afterwards?
You might trying pinging Carlos Sanchez - hes given feedback on
improving the project.xml to help m2 in the past.
I asked Wendy Smoak (who knows way more about maven/m2 than me) to
look at these "scopes" and she thinks they look good.
Niall
> > 3) Don't know why, but everyone seems to have changed mail archive
> > from eyebrowse
>
> Eyebrowse be dead.
yep. applied
> > 4) Add md5 checksums to the build would make creating the release easier.
>
> Wouldn't for me :)
yeh - i prefer to use the scripts
thanks for the review
i've cut an RC3
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
