On Wednesday 12 November 2008 5:08:21 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Benson,
>
> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.

Yea.   I would think there should be a 1.4.x branch for fixing 1.4.x issues 
(for both Axis and CXF and others) and let trunk start heading toward 2.0.

Dan


>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> > From the message I sent on 30 October:
> >
> > Some of these are:
> >
> > 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
> > 2) Improve performance.
> > 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
> > not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
> > schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
> > clumsy code.
> > 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
> > and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
> > representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
> > schemata from the API.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> >> Benson,
> >>
> >> #1) Please use the trunk.
> >>
> >> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
> >>
> >> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
> >> site, you can check that into svn as well
> >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
> >> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
> >> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> dims
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> >>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
> >>>
> >>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
> >>>
> >>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
> >>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
> >>> that activity?
> >>>
> >>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
> >>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
> >>>
> >>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
> >>>
> >>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
> >>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
> >>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
> >>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
> >>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com



-- 
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dankulp.com/blog

Reply via email to