created a branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/branches/modules/XmlSchema/1_4_X_BRANCH/
thanks, dims On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hearing no further remarks, I guess we go with this? Davanum or Dan, > would one of you like to do the basic branching honors? Or, if not, > give me some coaching on mechanics? > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +1, to be formal about it. >> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> +1 to start a 1.4.X branch and use trunk for active development >>> whatever the version that may turn out to be. >>> >>> thanks, >>> -- dims >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 5:08:21 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>>>> Benson, >>>>> >>>>> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema >>>>> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well. >>>> >>>> Yea. I would think there should be a 1.4.x branch for fixing 1.4.x issues >>>> (for both Axis and CXF and others) and let trunk start heading toward 2.0. >>>> >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> dims >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> > From the message I sent on 30 October: >>>>> > >>>>> > Some of these are: >>>>> > >>>>> > 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden. >>>>> > 2) Improve performance. >>>>> > 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's >>>>> > not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving >>>>> > schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and >>>>> > clumsy code. >>>>> > 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema >>>>> > and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML >>>>> > representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid >>>>> > schemata from the API. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >> Benson, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> #1) Please use the trunk. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> #2) please make a new branch from trunk. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web >>>>> >> site, you can check that into svn as well >>>>> >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema) >>>>> >> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here >>>>> >> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> thanks, >>>>> >> dims >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see >>>>> >>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for >>>>> >>> that activity? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email. >>>>> >>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the >>>>> >>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this >>>>> >>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals, >>>>> >>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to >>>>> >>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Kulp >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> http://dankulp.com/blog >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >>> >> > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
