> Well, I did write down the release process I used for 1.4.3 :-) > > I confess that I'm in favor of the two-vote system, but I'm not a PMC > member. If the PMC decides/decided not to go there, I'll modify the > Wiki page to match. > Great. Anyway having two votes is not a problem at all, as I mentioned before I was under the impression that we follow the one vote process. :-)
Actually we discussed about the release process in the gene...@ws.apache.org not in PMC. Deepal > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Deepal, >>> >>> No insult intended. >>> >> Hehe, do not even think about that. I am sorry if you understand >> something like that from my mail. >> >> Yes as I remember correct we decided not to have vote for the release >> process (anyway I need to double check this). >> >> "We need to write down the release process somewhere" >> >> Thank you! >> Deepal >> >>> I'm a recent addition to this project, and I don't >>> have all the history. If there was a prior policy decision to skip >>> 'start release' votes, I would have been ignorant of it. I >>> misunderstood your messages for lack of that bit of information. >>> >>> --benson >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Well, I know the apache release process. ;-) >>>> As I remember correct we decided not to have a vote for a release >>>> process and only for the binary artifacts. So I was under the impression >>>> the previous vote is for the release artifacts. >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> Deepal >>>> >>>> >>>>> Deepal, >>>>> >>>>> No, we don't move them until we collect the necessary votes. >>>>> >>>>> The process is: >>>>> >>>>> 1: vote to start a release process >>>>> 2: build and tag a release in a private staging area. >>>>> 3: announce vote for release >>>>> 4: people test out the artifacts in the private staging area. >>>>> 5: copy to the public repos (assuming that the vote passes) >>>>> >>>>> This is documented: >>>>> >>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/WS/release-management.html >>>>> >>>>> It's my understanding that this is global ASF Policy. Nothing goes >>>>> into the public (non-snapshot) repo except after a vote. >>>>> >>>>> I will move them when the vote closes, just as I did for 1.4.3, and I >>>>> imagine that Dims or someone did for all release before that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --benson >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I am sorry, seems like you have done everything, so just move everything >>>>>> to >>>>>> >>>>>> /www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/schema/XmlSchema >>>>>> >>>>>> [I can do that, but since you have signed so it is better you move those] >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> Deepal >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> The proposed release pieces can be found at: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bimargulies/maven_staging/org/apache/ws/commons/schema/XmlSchema/1.4.4/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://blogs.deepal.org >>>>>> http://deepal.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> >>>> http://blogs.deepal.org >>>> http://deepal.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Thank you! >> >> >> http://blogs.deepal.org >> http://deepal.org >> >> >> > > -- Thank you! http://blogs.deepal.org http://deepal.org
