Andreas, Well, I decided to follow the pattern at CXF instead, since Dan is usually way ahead of me. That uses 'closer.cgi' instead of 'download.cgi'. The existing site was a broken attempt to use download.cgi.
I just checked in a version that works, after editing to fix years of sloppy pathname edits. I'm surprised anyone's ever successfully download the package :-) --benson On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Andreas Veithen <andreas.veit...@gmail.com>wrote: > Benson, > > Did you have a look at the following page? > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-download-pages.html > > I always thought that the download.cgi based mechanism is the > preferred way to build download pages. > > Andreas > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 15:48, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I see what I have to do to fix this once and for all. > > >
