The fact that CXF uses closer.cgi is probably due to the fact that it used Confluence and that the available options to build a download page are more limited than in the case of a Maven site.
Andreas On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 16:40, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Andreas, > > Well, I decided to follow the pattern at CXF instead, since Dan is usually > way ahead of me. That uses 'closer.cgi' instead of 'download.cgi'. The > existing site was a broken attempt to use download.cgi. > > I just checked in a version that works, after editing to fix years of sloppy > pathname edits. I'm surprised anyone's ever successfully download the > package :-) > > --benson > > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Andreas Veithen > <andreas.veit...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Benson, >> >> Did you have a look at the following page? >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-download-pages.html >> >> I always thought that the download.cgi based mechanism is the >> preferred way to build download pages. >> >> Andreas >> >> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 15:48, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I see what I have to do to fix this once and for all. >> > >> >
