Odi's suggestion of starting a 2.1 branch now is a reasonable one.
Just to make one thing clear. It is a 2.0 branch and not a 2.1 branch I am talking about:
+----------> 2.0 Final
| �
CVS | � merge bug fixes back
| V
-----------X-----------X---------X----------> 2.1 (HEAD)
2.0 alpha 2 2.0 alpha 3 2.0 branch-X- designates a CVS tag
It's a bad idea to start new features and new architecture on a branch. Always do this on the trunk. Why? Because there will be fewer and smaller back merges.
Odi
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
