Sounds like a plan. BTW, I think we should release current CVS snapshot as BETA-2. If my memory does not fail me, we have not had a single new 'confirmed' bug for over two weeks or even more. I suggest we call it a release.
I am off to bed. Talk to you tomorrow Oleg On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 00:14, Michael Becke wrote: > On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 05:45 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > Mike, > > It does sound like a good idea to me, but could not it wait until 3.0, > > as it does seem to be exactly what Eric has been proposing as a > > "framework of interfaces"? > > It might fall within the "framework of interfaces" idea. My impression > was that this dealt more with HttpMethods/responses though. The idea > here would be to move some of the current connection code to something > more pluggable. > > > > Are there any pressing reasons for having it > > done within 2.1 release? Would it be a bit too much of a change? > > Nothing terribly pressing. I certainly do not think this is as urgent > as some of our other problems. The only case I can see for 2.1 would be > for the HttpConnectionFactory and in particular the pluggable isStale() > functionality. This came up a few months ago in regard to JSSE in pre > 1.4 JVMs. The problem being that they are always stale using our > current method of buffered reading from an open connection. > > In general we may want to rework the whole HttpConnection design for > 3.0 which may point to waiting. Let's leave this a little vague for > now. We can make a final decision when we vote on what to include in > 2.1. > > Mike > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
