DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19618>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19618 URI class constructors need revision, optimization ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-18 22:10 ------- I find that URI(String) constructor is too ambiguous. Should the URI character sequence be assumed to be escaped or per default or the other way around? I just do not know. I do not mind leaving a plain URI(String) constructor undeprecated as long as we all agree on a reasonable default. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
