Oleg, I do agree that the bug as described in bugzilla is not serious for the reasons you mention below. However, if you recall our discussion (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=commons-httpclient-dev@ jakarta.apache.org&msgNo=5279 ) the serious issue is caused by the underlying socket remaining open. Since there is already a bit of confusion, I think I'll go ahead and open a new bug with the correct description of the serious issue:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25592 The funny thing is, fixing the serious bug will automatically fix the non-serious one. Thanks Moh -----Original Message----- From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:38 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: 2.0rc3 before XMas? Mohammad, I guess I have at least half a dozen of outstanding patches at the moment ;-) so it is about a matter of priority. I do not mind committing the patch, however, I would like to have this one committed first: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25529 And I would still like to go through the regular review process for the 2.1 branch and to secure an OK from at least another committer. In my opinion the bug is not significant enough to be rushed. As to patching 2.0, I am not sure it is warranted. After all one MUST call HttpMethod#releaseConnection in order to ensure the connection release even if an exception is thrown during the method execution. Any strong option on this? Oleg On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 23:11, Rezaei, Mohammad A. wrote: > I would appreciate a resolution to this bug: > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25370 > > I personally think that the patch seems trivial enough that going for > 2.0 (instead of 2.1+) is probably warranted. > > Oleg: There were no comments from the list, so I assume there was > nothing glaringly wrong with our approach. Do you mind submitting the > patch you wanted? > > Thanks > Moh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:02 PM > To: Commons HttpClient Project > Subject: Re: 2.0rc3 before XMas? > > > I would love to. Funny, I was just thinking the same thing. We have > two options that I can see: > > - Create a full fledged rc 3 release. After a week or so, if there > are no major bugs, we could retag it as 2.0 final. > - Create a unofficial release and publish it from one of our personal > apache accounts. This one could then be tested thoroughly and released > as 2.0 final after everyone is happy that it works. > > My preference is for the second method, mostly because it avoids going > through the whole offical release process twice. Perhaps I am just > being lasy, but I think if we are comfortable that authentication and > proxying are working correctly then 2.0 is ready. We always have the > option of a 2.0.1 if anything major is missed. > > What does everyone think? > > Mike > > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > Folks, > > Any chance of getting 2.0rc3 out of the door before XMas? What do > > you > > think? > > > > Oleg > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
