DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26070>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26070 [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-30 04:07 ------- > My initial intention was to do away with ByteArrayRequestEntity(), but than I > thought I should discuss it with you first. What would we use as a replacement? The InputStreamReqestEntity? > Primarily in order to avoid throwing IllegalStateException. If parameterless > constructors and setContent may leave entity request objects in a inconsistent > state, why should they exist in the first place? I hear you. This goes along with the immutability. Fine with me. > I have concerns that some JDKs may end up converting the entire String to an > array of bytes prior to writing into the underlying output stream, which would > result in unnecessary waste of memory. I may be a little too pessimistic here, > though I think we should stay simple here until we run into a potential performance problem. > Mike, just take over those bits that you think make sense and incorporate them > into your coming patch. Ok. Can do. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
