On 18 May 2011 00:03, Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Laws are the one thing, liberty without harm to others the other thing. > You can't jump from a plane that is used for suicide, but you can look away > if you don't like to see an image. Absolutely not appreciated, strong > wording comparison. > And when people look away they very rarely look back, so what comparison do you want denial of liberty is denial of liberty, you chose the words you choose to argue its censorship and liberty, why should I not be able to express my opinion surely you dont want to see me censored and my liberty denied > > Am 17.05.2011 17:56, schrieb Gnangarra: > > > > On 17 May 2011 19:05, Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com>wrote: > >> If we buy this contributions with a loss of liberty. Then yes. Nothing is >> as worthy as liberty. >> >> While we are at it > do appreciate the denial of liberty for people who break the law? > do you appreciate the denial of liberty at airports that prevent your plane > being bombed? > > > -- > GN. > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com > Gn. Blogg: http://gnangarra.wordpress.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l > > -- GN. Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com Gn. Blogg: http://gnangarra.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
