Andrew Gray, 11/10/2011 20:11: > It may be that more controversial images provoke more meta-discussion, > with more links to them as a result (from talkpages, deletion > discussions, etc) and so are more likely to appear "popular" to the > search system, but that's just a guess.
Hm, Lucene Streisand effect. Béria Lima, 11/10/2011 20:31: > I guess that has something to do with the name of the images. The sexual > image has the name of File:Sexuality *pearl necklace* small.png > <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sexuality_pearl_necklace_small.png> > so, would be obvious to be one of the first results if you are looking > for *pearl necklace*. Looks like there are 248 exact file matches. <https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=%22pearl+necklace%22&fulltext=Search&ns6=1&profile=advanced> I see that the first image doesn't use information template, perhaps descriptions within templates are treated differently? Could be a wrong assumption based on how infoboxes work on Wikipedia. (Just more imaginative speculations...) Nemo _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
