Sounds good. I think more details on 'veto' validity are needed - we had a lot of problems in this issue. Like the second opinion.
It should also include some mention on release and codebase decisions ( i.e. majority vote for releases, and clarification on the 'revolution' rules ). I don't know if the 'revolution' rule is specific to jakarta or is implied by the 'majority takes the name' - but by definition a revolution can go over a veto ( otherwise it won't be a majority, but one person that can make this kind of decisions ). Costin On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 17:37, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > Probably the most important items I see as missing are ones related to > > voting: in particular the concept of binding votes, and lazy consensus. > > i have added these, and started a separate document devoted to the details > of voting. please see > > http://incubator.apache.org/drafts/glossary.html > http://incubator.apache.org/drafts/voting.html > > feedback and alternate viewpoints very welcome. these are living > documents, getting updated daily, so if you're interested in their > content i suggest checking back periodically. or maybe just > subscribe to cvs@incubator.apache.org :-) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
