> > > this opens the question of "leaving the door open with no lock" really > > > works in the long run or if we must live with "wiki terrorists".
> > The wiki theory is that it is so easy to repair vandalism that the immature > > cretins basically lose interest in their juvenile activities. For more > > discourse on the subject, see: > > http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?SocialAcceptabilityOfWikiVandalism > while I basically agree with you on the Wiki point of view, the question > (at least to me) remains, whether the Apache Wiki is an experiment in > communication or a tool for documentation. I'm not defending the approach. I was simply pointing you to a site that discusses it, and has a lot more experience that anyone here with respect to Wiki vandalism. My own opinion is that we could require end users to register, just as they have to register for a mailing list. The registration process would e-mail a unique SSL cert to install into a browser. With that SSL cert in place, users can update the Wiki. Without it, they are read-only. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
