On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 05:38:20 +0100 "David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On the other way, I wonder how Tetsuya gives the job too easily. > > There was no strong criticism. Simply the request that instead of the > > entire newsletter, an announcement be posted. Other than that, the > > newsletter (and Tetsuya's handling of it) have received praise and strong > > support. > Exactly. Yes, I think so. Just I got felt dizzy and nauseous in this morning (GMT+0900), after reading the controversy occured at [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Still I require tranquilizer, however :-) -- Of course, I know that the FAT mails would get nerves of some people, however, I DID want to let the *precious* efforts of the contributors and developers to be known by as many readers as possible and to be widespread. I did not want to assassinate the *precious* embryos of the efforts of the developers, our amigos. It is so called -- AMBIVALENCE -- in psychology term. IIRC, I declared, "I want to do experiments twice or three times." here in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because the Apache Software Foundation must be expected to be the sandbox of "trial and error" for the contributors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here, as I declared the resignation of the Editor of newsletter, I put my proposals for the next newsletter. (proposal as a ***third party***) ========[PROPOSAL]=============== 1. Creation of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is an aimed mailinglist for the readers of the apache newsletter. -- issued bi-monthly (This should depend upon the Editors' decisions, however) 2. When "The Apache Newsletter Issue #X" released (on the web), the Editor can post to [email protected] about the "release" of the newsletter. This would be expected to contain the brief headlines of the newsletter. (As Noel mentioned) 3. The Editor would be expected to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] "a few days after" the announcement at [email protected] 4. (OPTIONAL) There are many Java Developers who want to catch up with what is going on @ apache, so editor would be expected to post to [email protected] about the release of the newsletter as well (#2). ========[PROPOSAL]=============== Any thoughts? >> all (If we can achieve the good consensus of opinion here, I think I will be wholeheartedly able to pass a baton of the task of the newsletter editor to the others.) -- Tetsuya. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
