On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Would that make the PMCs responsible if something went haywire? If so, yikes.
Even so, i cannot see that as sustainable. How would the PMCs find the energy to verify that jobs were legitimate?
Why can't the PMC be responsible if the committers are the one the place the stuff (I see that all 'content' goes into CVS/SVN).
Perhaps some PMC members are happy to spend their time verifying job listings, updating the site with new listings, and removing obsolete ones. However, I strongly suspect that most of us have itches to scratch that we consider more important or enjoyable than helping other folks to find new jobs. ;-)
The original question that started this thread was about a mailing list, and IMHO that is the best way to deal with this, if we want to deal with it at all. Then it is up to the job hunter to verify the listings s/he might be interested in. They, after all, have the motivation to do so.
-- Martin Cooper
Ultimately, if the PMC/committers doesn't feel the Company listing is 'honorable' and 'legit', it is plainly refused. No need for fair play.
Same for 'looking for jobs' or 'contractor available'. It is a guide, and can be dealt by the PMC at their own discretion. If they think it is not worth it, just don't participate and keep their 'segment' in the CVS/SVN empty.
Cheers Niclas
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
