-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:41, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >> Point? > > That "consensus by attrition" is a negatively loaded term, yet a natural > occurring thing in all projects (people do leave healthy projects) which is > replenished with new blood (but in our case that is also turned into > something bad). > SO the point is; "Consensus by attrition" is FUD, and hard to argue against, > yet said enough many times, it has turned into "a fact". People leaving a project for J Random Reason is acceptable attrition. People leaving because they don't agree with the majority opinion is, too. A practice of asking people to leave, or trying to drive them away, because they don't agree with you is not acceptable. Charges of the latter were levied, and as I recall were supported by the email archives. If so (i.e., if I'm not misremembering), it's a factual observation of behaviour, not FUD. I suspect Noel already has the relevant source documents ready to hand if necessary. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQceiAprNPMCpn3XdAQFiSAQArJh8/1MVGH/yPzsaS7M9gjEtkv/pyvaB L4h5ndDHLAKJaVpNG53Izlkq4H+GMsWvP/TZ4v0s3xA6lAHMoatwAjrvpxG1wgDZ k5EkiXNGBLxOxIddfZYygbnqOAm0qvdmRO4vpX/nN+vPB9APoOFKGeLzPP+ru8KC 0/p/wEfDraM= =N2QT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
