-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: | |>> I don't think that they simply disable the backlight. Resuming from SHR |>> unstable takes about 5-6 seconds (no incoming call), while 2008.12 resumes |>> under 3 seconds. While this is not a scientific measurement, 2008.12 surely |>> is a lot faster. Any other ideas what they do differently? |> No idea, sorry. I have never seen 2008.12. It's definitely not a problem |> in the base system, since FSO ms5.1 resolves in 1 second (admittedly, |> with Qi, with U-Boot it might be 2 seconds). |> | My SHR resumed in about 4s. (Running from internal flash, not SDcard.) | First, nothing happens. Then the console shows itself for a little | while. finally, graphichs take over and the screen is redrawn. | | 1s would surely be an improvement.
If your kernel has the printk timestamping enabled, maybe the dmesg during suspend / resume has a hint if it's something on the kernel side. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmmlxoACgkQOjLpvpq7dMptXwCdH85IfZksSKJyDQ6u5Akk4T7p 3a0AnRwU+LRs9p2d2syTWBT88wZbvibq =GWNa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community