On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 20:03 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Am 16.10.2013 um 19:31 schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors: > > Balint Szente <bal...@szentedwg.ro> writes:
> >> What is not clear for me is that can a software be FSF/OSI "free" but > >> illegal to use? > > "Free" is a term only considering copyright. I.e. it is licenced under > "copyleft". This is incorrect. Copyleft and software freedom are different concepts. For example, BSD code is free software but not copyleft. The FSF explicitly describes the BSD license as a free software license: 'This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license' https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OriginalBSD -- Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
