I probably shouldn't have opened that site at work ;) I might branch my code and give it a try with CE embedded in my code. I'll report back and let everyone know if there was a memory improvement or not.
Raf On Jan 22, 2:13 pm, sprite <[email protected]> wrote: > I just pay attention to the commits and if I see anything that I want > myself I manually add it to my code. It seemed like the best option to > me because my CE install was so modified that it would be hard for me > to upgrade to desert branch and I didn't want to be stuck on Rails > 2.2.2 with engines. Of course you do lose the ability to automatically > update CE stuff as you do when running it as a plugin. > > The site I'm working on ishttp://www.vipwithme.com > > On Jan 21, 11:09 pm, rmahnovetsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > wow 30MB is awesome. Maybe that is an option for me I can merge CE > > with my own code. That will remove desert anyway, maybe that can save > > me a bit of memory. How do you go about getting the latest fixes for > > CE? I image it would be a manually process? > > > Raf > > > On Jan 22, 10:31 am, sprite <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My passenger processes are running at around 30MB.... > > > > I merged CE code with my own code though and also stripped out some > > > models, etc. I also eliminated the need for Engines (my app was > > > running on a pre desert build of CE). > > > > I am running Rails 2.3.5 on Ruby Enterprise Edition with Apache/ > > > Passenger 2.2.2 > > > > On Jan 21, 7:25 pm, rmahnovetsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > so if my app was originally about 60MB and your is about 70MB then > > > > that makes 130MB which is about what we see. Well it is hovering from > > > > 105 to 130MB now since we added minimagick in. Sound right? > > > > > On Jan 22, 1:42 am, Bruno Bornsztein <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Before I added the plugin I was using around 60-70 > > > > > > MB and now with CE I'm using around 130 - 140MB. Is this normal? > > > > > > It's been a while since my apps have been running on Passenger, but > > > > > this > > > > > doesn't sound right to me. As I recall, my apps used to hover around > > > > > 70 MB. > > > > > Anyone else? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CommunityEngine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/communityengine?hl=en.
