looks good to me

Paul

--- Steve Christensen <steve at smc.vnet.net> wrote:

> Paul-
> 
> I have redone the patch and Makefile.sfw to do what
> you suggest.
> The build works fine.
> 
> The webrev is updated
> 
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/rpmwebrev/
> 
> Steve C.
> 
> paulcun at talk21.com wrote:
> > Steve,
> > 
> > --- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> >> This is a code review request for a fix to the
> >> SFWrpm package files so that they will build in
> NV72
> >> or higher.  The webrev is at
> >>
> >>
> >
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/rpmwebrev/
> >> Details -
> >>
> >> In NV 72 or higher, there is now a file err.h in
> >> /usr/include that conflicts with a err.h file in
> the
> >> rpm source code.  When a build is attempted,
> parts
> >> of the build find the /usr/include/err.h file and
> >> the build fails.  The simplest thing to do was
> >> rename the rpm err.h file to errx.h and patch a
> few
> >> files to look for that instead of err.h.  The
> code
> >> then builds with no problems in a nightly in
> NV74. 
> >> I am open to other clever/cleaner ways to do
> this.
> > 
> > Comment:
> > rather than keep a seperate copy of errx.h (which
> > could be out of date next time the tarball is
> reved)
> > wouldn't it have been better to have simply rename
> > err.h to errx.h after the tarball has been
> > incompressed.
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> 


Reply via email to