The problems with the packages has been resolved.
New packages are now posted.

Sorry about that

marilyn

Steve Christensen wrote:
> Mike may be right (he ususally is) about there being some old packages 
> on the download machine.  I will grab the ones there and see what is 
> going on.  My machines are the "Official" build machines, Somewhere 
> between my build machines and the Sun downloads machines, there is a 
> glitch.  I will find it.
> 
> Steve C.
> 
> 
> 
> Milan Jurik wrote:
> 
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> Steve Christensen p????e v ??t 10. 04. 2007 v 15:17 -0400:
>>
>>> Milan -
>>>
>>> I will try to track down these problems and get them fixed immediately.
>>> This does not happen on my systems.  I just did an install and it worked
>>> fine.  I see that you are using 60 and I did the builds with 56, so 
>>> maybe there is some issue there.
>>>
>>
>> Can you try to download the official package and install it?
>>
>> Maybe we have some problem on the official build machines?
>>
>>> Steve C.
>>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Milan
>>
>>>
>>> Milan Jurik wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>>> Milan Jurik wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> /opt/sfw/man/man1/tcpdump.1
>>>>>> /opt/sfw/sbin/tcpdump
>>>>>> ERROR: content verification of </opt/sfw/sbin/tcpdump> failed
>>>>>>     file size <651808> expected <508320> actual
>>>>>>     file cksum <18393> expected <47819> actual
>>>>>> [ verifying class <none> ]
>>>>>> ERROR: content verification of </opt/sfw/sbin/tcpdump> failed
>>>>>>     file size <651808> expected <508320> actual
>>>>>>     file cksum <18393> expected <47819> actual
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Installation of <SFWtdmp> partially failed.
>>>>>> # # file /opt/sfw/sbin/tcpdump /opt/sfw/sbin/tcpdump:  ELF 32-bit 
>>>>>> LSB executable 80386 Version 1,
>>>>>> dynamically linked, stripped
>>>>>> # uname -a
>>>>>> SunOS xylabtwo 5.11 snv_60 i86pc i386 i86pc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some problem with packaging?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm not sure - possibly with the package build. It happens on
>>>>> sparc as well, and interesting if you look there you see that
>>>>> the package was built in April (that's the REV bit):
>>>>>
>>>>> VERSION=2007.03.14,REV=2007.04.02.01.58
>>>>>
>>>>> But if I look at the timestamp of the binary in the package:
>>>>>
>>>>> # pwd
>>>>> /net/sfwnv/gates/ccd/clone/packages/sparc/SFWtdmp/reloc/sfw/sbin
>>>>> # ls -l tcpdump
>>>>> -rwxr-xr--   1 mike_s   staff     573800 Nov 10 02:16 tcpdump
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm built in November. Others don't have this problem (checked
>>>>> SFWcoreu and the binaries are Apr 1).
>>>>>
>>>>> Even the last set of packages I downloaded, where SFWtdmp was
>>>>> built:
>>>>>
>>>>> REV=2007.02.21.02.13
>>>>>
>>>>> has the same tcpdump date and diffs the same, so it's been
>>>>> wrong for a bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> A quick grep for 'Nov 10' in the timestamps shows this is the
>>>>> case for
>>>>>     SFWsudo
>>>>>     SFWbrl
>>>>>     SFWtop
>>>>>     SFWxmcd
>>>>>     SFWoggl
>>>>>     SFWtdmp
>>>>>
>>>>> I am very confused though since the package build first deletes
>>>>> the entire directory before building the packages, and pkgmk shouldn't
>>>>> have recorded the new size of the binary in the package but thrown
>>>>> an old binary in - it's like something went into those packages
>>>>> and overwrote bits after they were built?
>>>>>
>>>> More interesting, SFWoggl contains parts from SFWao:
>>>>
>>>> The following files are already installed on the system and are being
>>>> used by another package:
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_append_option.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_close.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_default_driver_id.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_device.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_driver_id.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_driver_info.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_driver_info_list.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_example.c
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_file_extension.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_free_options.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_info.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_initialize.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_open_file.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_open_live.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_option.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_play.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_plugin_close.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_plugin_device_clear.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_plugin_device_init.html
>>>> [Hit <RETURN> to continue display]
>>>>
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_plugin_driver_info.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_plugin_file_extension.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_plugin_open.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_plugin_play.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_plugin_set_option.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_plugin_test.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_sample_format.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/ao_shutdown.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/config.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/drivers.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/index.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/libao-api.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/overview.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/plugin-api.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/plugin-overview.html
>>>>   /opt/sfw/doc/libao-0.8.3/style.css
>>>>   /opt/sfw/include/ao/ao.h
>>>>   /opt/sfw/include/ao/os_types.h
>>>>   /opt/sfw/include/ao/plugin.h
>>>>   /opt/sfw/lib/ao/plugins-2/libsun.la
>>>> [Hit <RETURN> to continue display]
>>>>
>>>>   /opt/sfw/lib/ao/plugins-2/libsun.so
>>>>   /opt/sfw/lib/libao.la
>>>>   /opt/sfw/lib/libao.so.2.1.1
>>>>   /opt/sfw/man/man5/libao.conf.5
>>>>   /opt/sfw/share/aclocal/ao.m4
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Milan
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> companion-discuss mailing list
>>>> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>> http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> companion-discuss mailing list
>>> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss

Reply via email to